Sad day, 'for the Man on the Clapham Omnibus'.by scruffy 23 Nov 2009
Just returned from my small claims court appearance and am seathing with rage! |
BACK to 'Read stories' home |
I read your story with interest. My story has some similarities. (See "A long and sad story but worth a read") rnrnClause 58 is (allegedly) conditional on the Highway Authority being able to show the court they have taken reasonable precautions to prevent the highway being dangerous to traffic. but even if they did not repair the pot-hole for months or fix any warning notices or cones or impose a speed limit, they will mount their defence on the basis of Section 58. rnrnThe HA's surveyor will say anything to protect their client and the HA's solicitors will ignore the courts instructions and bombard you and the court with irrelevant works records to show how often they have diligently repaired the road. rnrnThe court are not really interested in the facts - they want a nice simple straightforward case so they can bang it out in half an hour, and get off for lunch.rnrn The court will not be bothered to read huge number of papers and a soon as it gets into Fast Track, you will not be able to afford the costs. Then its Open Season on you as they will extract as much in costs as they possibly can. rnrnYou have my sympathy.
To post a comment you need to be signed in. Please enter your email address and password below to sign in, or if you don’t have a password click the link to register.
| New evidence in St Helens Council case | Added on 24 Apr 2007; comment [0] |
| A long and sad story, but worth the read. | Added on 10 Dec 2009; comment [0] |
| Victory for the small man!! | Added on 16 Jan 2010; comment [1] |
| Road of Dudley | Added on 18 Feb 2010; comment [0] |
| Marford Hill North Wales Pothole claim-My story so fra incl ltr/pics | Added on 05 Jun 2010; comment [0] |